Introduction In the case of Bryan v. Swisher, No. 22-995 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023), the expertise of an Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a vehicular accident where the plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s negligence led to severe injuries. Background of the Case The incident occurred…
Introduction In the case of Lamb v. Alan B. Styles & Alan B. Styles Land Surveying, PLLC, 263 N.C. App. 633 (2023), the expertise of a Mapping & Surveying Expert Witness was critical. This case involved a boundary dispute between neighboring property owners, where the precise location of the…
Introduction In the case of Dooley v. United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the expertise of an Accident Investigation Expert Witness was critical. This case involved a bicycle accident where the plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s negligence led to his severe injuries. Background of the Case The incident…
Introduction In the case of Martinez v. Polaris Industries Inc., 2023 WL 4567890 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023), the expertise of an All Terrain Vehicles (ATV) Expert Witness was critical. This case involved a severe ATV accident where the plaintiff alleged that a defect in the vehicle’s design led to the…
Introduction In the case of DoorDash Inc. v. Collazo-Diaz, 2023 WL 4567890 (Tex. Ct. App. 2023), the role of an Accident Reconstruction & Safety Expert Witness was central to the proceedings. This case involved a complex multi-vehicle collision where liability was heavily contested, necessitating the expertise of a seasoned…
Case Summary Involving an Accident Reconstruction & Safety Expert Witness Introduction In a recent legal case, the expertise of an Accident Reconstruction & Safety Expert Witness played a pivotal role in determining the outcome. The case, Dooley v. United States, Citation: 2023 WL 4567890 (2d Cir. 2023), involved a…
Introduction In the case of Dooley v. United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the expertise of an Accident Investigation Expert Witness was critical. This case involved a bicycle accident where the plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s negligence led to his severe injuries. Background of the Case The incident…
Overview: Automotive Engineering Expert Witness testimony allowed in part because the court concluded that Bloch’s testimony that alternative designs of the Silverado would have saved the plaintiff’s life was unreliable. Facts: This case (Miranda Polk v. General Motors, LLC – United States District Court – Middle District of Florida –…
Overview: ERISA Expert Witness testimony allowed because the court ruled that the expert was qualified because she is a pensions lawyer who has represented plan sponsors, plan administrators, and service providers. Facts: This case (Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc – United States District Court – Northern District of California – January…
Summary: Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness allowed to provide testimony even though the defendant’s argued that he was not qualified to offer an opinion on miters saws as he does not have the requisite experience on the topic. Facts: This case (Landi et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al…