Plaintiff sued defendant on the grounds that the Virginia Incumbent Protection Act is not constitutional. The plaintiff hired a law & legal expert witness to assist in the case. The defendant filed a motion to exclude, which was denied by the court.
Plumbing and HVAC Expert Witness Comments on Polyethylene Tubing
Plumbing and HVAC Expert Witness Russell Keeler of Chason Energy commented on an assignment involving PEX (cross-linked polyethylene) tubing:
“PEX was installed in a residence, and when the water was turned on, it was found that the domestic water was unusable, as the water was blue, caustic and toxic. My investigation disclosed that the cause of the problem was a combination of brass fittings (an alloy of copper and zinc) and water with a high pH. The high pH caused the zinc to go into solution as zinc hydroxide. While the pH does not directly attack the copper, some copper goes into solution and creates copper hydroxide. Copper hydroxide is blue, caustic and toxic. The solution to the problem was to treat the incoming water, as it was too expensive to replace the fittings.”
One Forensic Accounting Expert Witness Allowed, Another Allowed in Part.
Plaintiff filed suit against defendant for non-payment of overtime wages. Defendant hired two forensic accounting expert witnesses to provide testimony. The plaintiff filed motions to exclude, one of which was granted in its entirety and one of which was granted in part.
Crime Scene Analysis and Police Procedures Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part
Plaintiff sued defendants after a physical altercation on plaintiff’s property. The plaintiffs hired a crime scene analysis expert witness and police procedures expert witness to assist in their case. The defendants filed two motions to exclude, which the court granted in part and denied in part.
Marketing Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part
Plaintiff filed suit against defendant alleging trademark infringement. Defendant hired a marketing expert witness to assist in their case. The plaintiff filed a motion to exclude the testimony of this expert, which the court partially granted.
Orthopedic Surgery, Professional Engineering, and Trucking Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part
Plaintiff sued defendant for negligence in response to a car accident involving two tractor-trailers. The plaintiff hired an orthopedic surgery expert witness, a professional engineering expert witness, and a trucking expert witness to provide testimony. The defendant filed motions to exclude. The court granted the three motions in part and denied them in part.
Family Practice/Family Medicine and Social Work/Social Services Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part
Plaintiffs’, former students, sued defendant insurance company for coverage for a dispute with their former school. The plaintiffs hired a family practice/family medicine expert witness and and a social work/social services expert witness to assist in their case. The defendant filed a motion to exclude. The court granted the motions in part and denied them in part.
Neuroradiology and Neuropsychology Expert Witness Testimony Allowed
Plaintiff sued defendants for injuries caused by a head-on automobile collision. The defendants hired a neuroradiology expert witness and a neuropsychology expert witness to assist in their case. The plaintiff filed motions to exclude these experts, which were denied by the court.
Pediatrics and Neurology Expert Witnesses Allowed; Neuropsychology Expert Witness Excluded
Plaintiff sued defendant after giving birth to two children with physical deformities and cognitive disabilities. She alleges that this occurred due to her taking Depakote while pregnant. Plaintiff hired three experts to assist in her case. The defendant filed motions to exclude these experts. The court granted one of these motions and denied two.
Neurology Expert Witness Allowed with Prejudice and Store Operations & Retail Expert Allowed in Part.
Plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit against the Defendant. Defendant hired a neurology expert witness and Plaintiff hired an store operations & retail expert witness. Both parties filed motions to exclude. The Plaintiff’s motion was denied with prejudice and the Defendant’s motion was granted in part and denied in part.