In the recent case of Monsanto Company v. Hardeman, No. 19-16636 (9th Cir. 2023), the testimony of a
Chemicals Expert Witness played a pivotal role. This case revolved around claims that Monsanto’s herbicide, Roundup, caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the plaintiff, Edwin Hardeman.
In the recent case of Kenai Ironclad Corp. v. CP Marine Services, LLC, No. 22-30311 (5th Cir. 2023), the testimony of an
Admiralty & Maritime Expert Witness played a pivotal role. This case involved a breach of contract related to the repair and conversion of an offshore supply vessel.
In the recent case of Johnson v. FedEx Freight, Inc., No. 21-1456 (E.D. Mo. 2023), the testimony of a
Black Box/Data Recorder Expert Witness was pivotal. This case involved a severe vehicular accident where the plaintiff, Johnson, claimed that the truck driver employed by FedEx Freight was negligent and that data from the truck’s black box would support this claim.
In the recent case of Trice v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., the expertise of a
Biomechanics Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a tragic motor vehicle collision that resulted in severe injuries to a toddler, raising questions about the safety and design of a booster seat manufactured by the defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
In the recent case of Dooley v. United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the testimony of a
Bicycle Expert Witness was pivotal. This case involved a cyclist, Dooley, who suffered significant injuries after colliding with an open car door operated by a U.S. Marine recruiter.
In the recent case of USA v. Smith, the testimony of an
Aviation Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a pilot who faced charges related to violating FAA regulations during a flight operation in a national park, leading to legal disputes over regulatory interpretations and safety compliance.
In the recent case of Evans v. City of Lee’s Summit, the expertise of an
Aquatics Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a lawsuit concerning a waterpark breach of contract related to lifeguard operations and safety standards.
In the recent case of Mace v. AAA Cooper Transportation, No. 23-2341 (La. Ct. App. 2023), the testimony of an
Automotive Expert Witness was pivotal. This case involved a collision between a car and an 18-wheeler, where the plaintiff alleged that the truck driver’s negligence caused significant injuries.
In the case of Bryan v. Swisher, No. 22-995 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023), the expertise of an
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness was crucial.
In the case of Lamb v. Alan B. Styles & Alan B. Styles Land Surveying, PLLC, 263 N.C. App. 633 (2023), the expertise of a
Mapping & Surveying Expert Witness was critical.
