Summary: Criminology Expert Witness testimony allowed by the court as other courts have allowed the expert to provide testimony on his area of topic.
Pharmacology Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Wrongful Distribution of Medicine Claim
Summary: Pharmacology Expert Witness allowed in case claiming wrongful distribution of medication even though his report was produced from the facts in the case.
Personal Property Valuation Expert Witness Testimony Allowed In Property Damage Litigation
Summary: Defendant hired a Personal Property Valuation Expert Witness to provide testimony in relation to damage caused by Hurricane Harvey despite the plaintiff’s claim that the expert did not keep his notes.
Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Crash Lawsuit
Summary: Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness testimony not excluded in off-road crash and rollover case as the court opined that his testimony was based on a flawed methodology.
Railroad Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part in Case Involving an Injury on the Job
8Summary: Railroad Expert Witness testimony allowed in part related to a personal injury incurred on a railroad car despite the opinion by the court that his testimony would not assist the trier of fact.19
Correctional Healthcare Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Medical Care Litigation
Summary: Correctional Healthcare Expert Witness testimony allowed in case involving a stroke in a detention center even though the defendants argued that his testimony was irrelevant and prejudicial.
Pathology Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part in Civil Rights Case
Summary: Pathology Expert Witness allowed in part despite not having police procedures experience.
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Car Accident Litigation
Summary: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Expert Witness testimony allowed despite the plaintiff’s contention that an expert witness should examine the damages at issue.
Radiology Expert Witness Testimony Allowed in Part in Medical Malpractice Litigation Involving Filter
Summary: Radiology Expert Witness testimony is allowed in part and excluded in part as the court determined that the expert was qualified to offer an opinion on the plaintiff’s back pain, but not his anxiety and depression.
Facts: This case (Leus v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Missouri – September 22, 2021) involves a claim of medical malpractice against a doctor who implanted a filter into the plaintiff who was going to have bariatric surgery. The plaintiff claims that the filter punctured his inferior vena cava and caused back pain and internal bleeding. The defendant hired Radiology Expert Witness Christopher Morris to provide testimony. The plaintiff filed a motion to exclude Morris’s testimony from being admitted to the court.
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness Allowed in Tractor Trailer Crash Case
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness was allowed to provide testimony despite defendant’s argument that he did not extract the data himself.